In early October, the Bosnian National Soccer team cemented
their place in the 2014 World Cup Finals in Brazil. Shortly after, Daria
Sito-Sucic and Gordana Katana wrote an article
about the continued ethnic divide in Bosnia amongst Bosnian Serbs, Bosnian
Croats and Bosniaks, using the success of the team to tell the story.
The article explains why this was such a big deal for the
national team and how communities within Bosnia were effected by the game. In
Banja Luka, the main city of the Serb Republic in Bosnia, the game was not
aired. People who wanted to watch the game had to order special channels that
broadcast the event. It was a great way to show how such a large story can
impact the smallest community in an already small country.
The writers used the success of the ethnically diverse
Bosnian team to highlight the dysfunctions of the country’s government.
“The Bosnian federation was on the
verge of bankruptcy. Three former officials, one of them an ex-commander of the
Muslim-dominated Bosnian army during the war, were jailed last year for tax
evasion and embezzlement.
Many foreign-based players and devoted soccer fans
boycotted the national team, angry at political interference which they said
was spoiling otherwise harmonious relations among players and coaches.”
It reminded me of my experience working on my
midterm project. Because I am Bosnian, I had trouble talking to Serbian parents
that sent their children to St. Sava Academy. I clearly had no dog in the
fight, but it was hard knowing that people didn’t want to talk to me because of
who I am or where I come from. I thought I left that back in Bosnia in 1997.
My article isn’t as much about the
dysfunctions of the school, but the importance of the school to the Serbian
community. The article about the Bosnian National Team is the same. The article
mentions the success of the team, but it’s more about the dysfunction of the
government and the effect of that on national pride.
No comments:
Post a Comment